In this post we'll look at how both nouns and verbs can be formed into adjectives by use of suffixes. (And though a little off subject, how they can be formed for other uses...). It follows on from the post on participles in Pali.
The question arises 'how do we know?' Some words appear to belong to two or more categories:
Well, first, there are morphological differences, ie. verbs tend to take tense, as in 'smiled' above; then there are functional differences - how the terms are actually being used in a specific sentence. The important point is that when a word is said to be a verb or an adjective etc. we are usually referring to how it is used rather than as something intrinsic to the word itself.
Adjectives tend to describe states, properties or attributes of things. This category tends to be used in one of two ways; either as a modifier of a noun or as a predicate in an equational sentence. for instance the adjective 'wise' can be used:
We seen already that a substantive noun can be attributed in Pali - have qualities added to it - through either adjectives, complements or in apposition. And these all fall under the term attributive because they describe, or add, a quality to another substantive noun.
Nouns stems ending in the above suffixes have the sense of 'possessing the quality of...' and can be often be rendered in English by adding -ed to the noun. For instance,
And like other adjectives in Pali, a noun taking vant/mant/(v)in, can also stand alone as a substantive it its own right, meaning 'the one who possesses such a quality'. Eg.
The declension of these nominal adjectives is similar to that of present & past participles seen previously however the masculine singular -vat declines now as -vā rather than -vaṃ.
Note: If you want to download these tables see the end of this section...
Thus for -vā:
And -mā:
And the ending -(v)in, the v is optional with nouns as possessives.
Thus -(v)in / -(v)ī:
Finally for nouns, it might might be worth adding that they can be made into verbs too using Denominative endings. In Pali, denominatives confer to a noun the notions 'to be or act like', 'to make', or 'to experience' and are rare except in poetry.
Verb stems can also take the suffix -in but then also act as possessive adjectives. I have not found many Pali grammar guides which specifically describes verb forms ending with -in (Duroiselle pg 102), but in Coulson's 'Teach Yourself Sanskrit' it appears that such verbs can be rendered in English by adding -ing. For instance:
As there is little information in the available Pali grammars, it is unclear if these verbal adjectives can also stand alone as substantive nouns to mean 'one who possesses such quality', (as with nominal possessives above).
But I note that the PED dictionary describes both adjectivally and as agents the following:
Anyway they seem to decline like the table -(v)in above but without the (v). Also verb stems ending -ā add -(y)in...
Here the reader maybe reminded of the so called agent nouns (Warder pg 209) which are formed from a verb but refers to the ‘doer’ of the verb. In English, such nouns are often formed by adding the suffix ‘-er’; e.g.
In Pali, the suffix –(i)tar is added to the verb root, and -aka, -ika, -in, -vi(n) to verbs in compounds.
Well I'll put up more examples of translation in the next post: Satipatthana Sutta - part 1
What is an adjective?
It's probably worth pointing out, in these posts I've been happily talking about word classes - nouns, verb, adjectives etc - without really defining what I mean. Linguists have categorised words as belonging to certain groups. And we are told that a noun is the name of a person, place, thing or idea; a verb is an action or state; while an adjective is a description word that tells us more about a noun.The question arises 'how do we know?' Some words appear to belong to two or more categories:
cold : 'I have a cold' (noun) or 'it is a cold night' (adj)
smile : 'the monk smiled' (verb) or 'I like your smile' (noun)
smile : 'the monk smiled' (verb) or 'I like your smile' (noun)
Well, first, there are morphological differences, ie. verbs tend to take tense, as in 'smiled' above; then there are functional differences - how the terms are actually being used in a specific sentence. The important point is that when a word is said to be a verb or an adjective etc. we are usually referring to how it is used rather than as something intrinsic to the word itself.
Adjectives tend to describe states, properties or attributes of things. This category tends to be used in one of two ways; either as a modifier of a noun or as a predicate in an equational sentence. for instance the adjective 'wise' can be used:
a wise man,
the man is wise,
the man, who is wise,...
the man is wise,
the man, who is wise,...
We seen already that a substantive noun can be attributed in Pali - have qualities added to it - through either adjectives, complements or in apposition. And these all fall under the term attributive because they describe, or add, a quality to another substantive noun.
Nominal Adjectives
Now although Pali has words which are specifically adjectival in meaning, it doesn't really distinguish between nouns and adjectives. So any noun stem can be turned into an adjective by use of certain suffixes.Pali Stems ending in vat/vant, mat/mant - the possessive suffix
By nominal here I mean based on a noun. So a nominal possessive is a noun stem that has a possessive suffix added to it.
-vant, or -vat before nouns stems in a/ā,
-(v)in also to stems in a,
-mant, or -mat to the other stem endings
(Note some grammar guides shorten these suffixes to -vā, -vī & -mā.).-(v)in also to stems in a,
-mant, or -mat to the other stem endings
Nouns stems ending in the above suffixes have the sense of 'possessing the quality of...' and can be often be rendered in English by adding -ed to the noun. For instance,
bhaga, good fortune; bhagavant, possessing good fortune = blessed
pakkha, wing; pakkhin, possessing wings = winged
anga, limb; angin, having limbs = limbed
cakkhu, eye; cakkhumant, having eyes = clear sighted
Used as straight adjectives, of course, these terms will be declined to agree with the substantive they are describing - in case, gender and number.pakkha, wing; pakkhin, possessing wings = winged
anga, limb; angin, having limbs = limbed
cakkhu, eye; cakkhumant, having eyes = clear sighted
And like other adjectives in Pali, a noun taking vant/mant/(v)in, can also stand alone as a substantive it its own right, meaning 'the one who possesses such a quality'. Eg.
pakkhin, a winged one = a bird
bhagavant, a blessed one = buddha
bhagavant, a blessed one = buddha
agārin one who has or inhabits a house, = a householder
agārinī a housewife
agārinī a housewife
The declension of these nominal adjectives is similar to that of present & past participles seen previously however the masculine singular -vat declines now as -vā rather than -vaṃ.
Note: If you want to download these tables see the end of this section...
Thus for -vā:
-vā | Masculine (like -at/-ant) | Neuter (like -at/-ant) | Feminine (like -atī/-antī) | |||
Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |
Nominative |
-vā, -vanto |
-vanto, -vantā |
-vaṃ, -vanta |
-vantāni, -vantā. |
-vatī, -vantī. |
-vatī, -vatiyo, -vantī, -vantiyo |
Vocative | -vā, -va | -vanto | -va, -vaṃ | |||
Accusative |
-vaṃ, -vantaṃ. |
-vante. |
-vaṃ, -vantaṃ |
-vatiṃ, -vantiṃ. |
||
Instrumental |
-vatā, -vantena |
-vantehi -vantebhi |
-vatā, -vantena. |
-vantehi -vantebhi |
-vatiyā, -vantiyā. |
-vatīhi, -vatībhi, -vantīhi, -vantībhi. |
Ablative |
-vatā, -vantā, -vantasmā, -vantamhā. |
-vatā, -vantā, -vantasmā, -vantamhā. |
||||
Dative |
-vato, -vantassa |
-vataṃ, -vantānaṃ |
-vato, -vantassa. |
-vataṃ, -vantānaṃ. |
-vatīnaṃ, -vantīnaṃ. |
|
Genitive | ||||||
Locative |
-vati, -vante, -vantasmiṃ, -vantamhi. |
-vantesu |
-vati, -vante, -vantasmiṃ, -vantamhi. |
-vantesu |
-vatiyā, -vatiyaṃ, -vantiyā, -vantiyaṃ. |
-vantīsu, -vatīsu. |
And -mā:
-mā | Masculine (like -at/-ant) | Neuter (like -at/-ant) | Feminine (like -atī/-antī) | |||
Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |
Nominative |
-mā, -manto |
-manto, -mantā |
-maṃ, -manta |
-mantāni, -mantā. |
-matī, -mantī. |
-matī, -matiyo, -mantī, -mantiyo |
Vocative | -mā, -ma | -manto | -ma, -maṃ | |||
Accusative |
-maṃ, -mantaṃ. |
-mante. |
-maṃ, -mantaṃ |
-matiṃ, -mantiṃ. |
||
Instrumental |
-matā, -mantena |
-mantehi -mantebhi |
-matā, -mantena. |
-mantehi -mantebhi |
-matiyā, -mantiyā. |
-matīhi, -matībhi, -mantīhi, -mantībhi. |
Ablative |
-matā, -mantā, -mantasmā, -mantamhā. |
-matā, -mantā, -mantasmā, -mantamhā. |
||||
Dative |
-mato, -mantassa |
-mataṃ, -mantānaṃ |
-mato, -mantassa. |
-mataṃ, -mantānaṃ. |
-matīnaṃ, -mantīnaṃ. |
|
Genitive | ||||||
Locative |
-mati, -mante, -mantasmiṃ, -mantamhi. |
-mantesu |
-mati, -mante, -mantasmiṃ, -mantamhi. |
-mantesu |
-matiyā, -matiyaṃ, -mantiyā, -mantiyaṃ. |
-mantīsu, -matīsu. |
And the ending -(v)in, the v is optional with nouns as possessives.
Thus -(v)in / -(v)ī:
–(v)ī | Masculine (like –ī/in) | Neuter (like –?) | Feminine (like -ī/in) | |||
Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |
Nominative | -(v)ī | -(v)ino | -(v)i, -(v)iṃ | -(v)īni, -(v)ī | -(v)inī | -(v)iniyo |
Vocative | - | - | - | - | ||
Accusative |
-(v)iṃ, -(v)inaṃ |
-(v)ino | -(v)iṃ | -(v)iniyo | ||
Instrumental | -(v)inā | -(v)ihi, -(v)īhi | -(v)inā | -(v)ihi, -(v)īhi | -(v)iniyā | -(v)inīhi |
Ablative |
-(v)inā, -(v)ismā, -(v)imhā |
-(v)inā, -(v)ito, -(v)ismā, -(v)imhā |
||||
Dative | -(v)ino |
-(v)inaṃ, -(v)īnaṃ |
-(v)ino |
-(v)inaṃ, -(v)īnaṃ |
-(v)inīnaṃ | |
Genitive | -(v)ino, -(v)issa | |||||
Locative |
-(v)ini, -(v)ismiṃ, -(v)imhi |
-(v)isu, -(v)īsu |
-(v)ismiṃ, -(v)imhi |
-(v)isu, -(v)īsu |
-(v)iniyā, -(v)iniyaṃ |
-(v)inīsu |
Download
Comparatives
One other slightly confusing thing is that adjectives ending in -mat/mant, -vat/vant, and -(v)in drop these suffixes before the comparative and superlative suffixes which are formed directly on the stem. For instance:
guṇavant possessed of good qualities, = virtuous,
- comparative guṇiyo, more virtuous
- superlative guṇiṭṭha; most virtuous
- comparative guṇiyo, more virtuous
- superlative guṇiṭṭha; most virtuous
Finally for nouns, it might might be worth adding that they can be made into verbs too using Denominative endings. In Pali, denominatives confer to a noun the notions 'to be or act like', 'to make', or 'to experience' and are rare except in poetry.
Verbal adjectives
We seen previously that verb stems can be used in a strictly non-verb manner - functioning as a subject, in/direct object, subject complement, adjective, or adverb in a sentence. These include:
We've seen already that present participles can be formed by the use of the possessive suffixes -vat/vant; and active forms of past participles from -vat/vant/vin. The declension of these participles (based on verb stems) and nominal adjectives (from noun stems) only differs in the masculine singular. So care must be taken to distinguish a word formed on a verbal base from that of a noun.
participles: both past & present (though in Pali past participles may act as finite verbs too)
& verbals: infinitives & absolutives
& verbals: infinitives & absolutives
But I've also come across another verb form...
Verbal stems in -(v)in
Above I've listed -(v)in as an alternative for -vant for noun stems in -a.Verb stems can also take the suffix -in but then also act as possessive adjectives. I have not found many Pali grammar guides which specifically describes verb forms ending with -in (Duroiselle pg 102), but in Coulson's 'Teach Yourself Sanskrit' it appears that such verbs can be rendered in English by adding -ing. For instance:
anupassati, to contemplate; anupassin contemplating
√kar, to do; kārin doing
carati to walk; cārin walking, practicing
These are thus a type of verbal adjective, similar to present participles, but tending to act as adjectives. They may also sometimes be called attributive verbs.√kar, to do; kārin doing
carati to walk; cārin walking, practicing
As there is little information in the available Pali grammars, it is unclear if these verbal adjectives can also stand alone as substantive nouns to mean 'one who possesses such quality', (as with nominal possessives above).
But I note that the PED dictionary describes both adjectivally and as agents the following:
aticarati, to transgress, commit adultery; aticārin transgressing; aticārinī an adulteress
kayati to buy; kayin buying or a buyer, one who buys
kayati to buy; kayin buying or a buyer, one who buys
Though I can't be sure as I don't have a reference.
Anyway they seem to decline like the table -(v)in above but without the (v). Also verb stems ending -ā add -(y)in...
Here the reader maybe reminded of the so called agent nouns (Warder pg 209) which are formed from a verb but refers to the ‘doer’ of the verb. In English, such nouns are often formed by adding the suffix ‘-er’; e.g.
‘lead-er’, ‘speak-er’, ‘deceiv-er’, ‘teach-er’, etc.
In Pali, the suffix –(i)tar is added to the verb root, and -aka, -ika, -in, -vi(n) to verbs in compounds.
Well I'll put up more examples of translation in the next post: Satipatthana Sutta - part 1
Comments
Good to find this interesting blog of yours. Could you please write more on verbs that take noun or adjective form. For instance, how will the verb such as "vittaka" be changed to word meaning focused one.Will it be suffixed by la or ra ?Is the derivative Vittakala possible?
Please reply.
Thanks and regards
Mahesh India