Usually in Pali, words referring to the same thing are in the same case & number. This is especially true of nominative & accusative cases. In this post we're going to look at common examples when two or more nouns occur together in Nominative or Accusative cases.
Pali Noun Attributes
Most commonly, several nouns occurring in the nominative (& sometimes in accusative) case are probably attributes to a similar substantive noun. (Note: substantive is a loose term meaning something of substance, an entity, which can stand by itself, in distinction to an adjective).Noun attributes describe or qualify a noun. They add a characteristic or specify quality. For instance:
a big book
a blue book
a sad book
a blue book
a sad book
We've seen this already in our previous example (SN8.6):
sāriputto | mahāpañño | dhammaṃ | deseti | bhikkhunaṃ |
Nom | Nom | Acc | Pres, Act | Dat/Gen |
m | m | m | m | |
sgl | sgl | sgl | sgl | pl |
3rd pers | ||||
sāriputta | (the) very wise | (the) doctrine | (he) teaches | (to) the monks |
Sāriputta, the very wise, teaches the doctrine to the monks |
In English, a noun attribute can be of several types:
- (adjective) The wise Sāriputta
- (apposition) Sāriputta, the wise
- (complement) Sāriputta, (who) is wise
Pali Adjectives
Adjectives in Pali usually precede the nouns they qualify. This is one way to distinguish them.odātaṃ vatthaṃ a white robe
kallāyo kaññāyo clever girls
khuddā gajā little elephants
dhanavā puriso a rich person
kallāyo kaññāyo clever girls
khuddā gajā little elephants
dhanavā puriso a rich person
In certain situation, there can be a gender conflict when an adjective is used to qualify several nouns each with different genders:
kallo dārako kaññā => the clever boy & girl
When genders conflict, the masculine takes precedence over the feminine, and the neuter over both.More on adjectives in Pali in the next post.
Pali Attributes in Apposition
Unlike adjectives, attributes in Apposition in Pali, usually follow the noun they qualify. As in the nominative phrase ‘sāriputto mahāpañño’. We can guess from the word order that mahāpañño is not an adjective but an Appositional attribute.Apposition is where the attribute semantically ‘runs alongside’ the subject noun while both referring to the same thing and is often expressed in English by parenthesis. For instance:
John, our butcher,...
My friend, the monk,…
Ānanda, the Buddha's attendant,...
My friend, the monk,…
Ānanda, the Buddha's attendant,...
So ‘sāriputto mahāpañño’ can be rendered ‘Sāriputta, the very wise,..’
Another example of apposition in Accusative:
buddhaṃ | saraṇaṃ | gacchāmi |
Acc | Acc | Pres, Act. |
m | n | |
sgl | sgl | sgl |
1st pers. | ||
(the) Buddha | (a) protection | (I) go |
To the Buddha, a protection, I go |
I go to the buddha, a protection"
"I go to the buddha, (who is) a protection
Note: that if the author meant: ‘I go to the buddha for protection’, i.e. in order to receive protection, then saraṇa would be in the dative case. Some authors translate this ‘I go to the buddha as protection’, which is a compromise.
Complements, Linking verbs & Nominal Sentences
Similar to apposition are linking verbs or copulas. Linking verbs unlike normal verbs, equate a subject to a state of being, rather than describing an action.
the monk is sad
the book is large
the book is large
Technically, they do not take objects, but complements. (also sometimes confusingly called predicates!)
And can be of two types:
He is a monk He = a monk (predicate nominal)
The elephants are small The elephants = small (predicate adjective)
The elephants are small The elephants = small (predicate adjective)
Linking verbs include copulas such as the English verb ‘to be’ and its derivatives ‘am, is, are, was, were’ etc. as well as verbs of perception such as look, sound, or taste.
Now often in Pāli these linking verbs are not explicitly written... This means, not all Pali sentences contain a verb!
In some situations, two adjacent nouns in the same case & number may be equated where a linking ‘is’ has been omitted. In this case, the first noun is usually the subject and the second the complement (an adjective, pronoun or noun). This can also happen with phrases within a larger sentence too.
Verb-less (Nominal) Sentences in Pali
If the linking verb is omitted these are sometimes termed nominal sentences as they are made up of entirely nouns. So, as example, consider the following sentence where there is no verb and every noun is in nominative case!kammaṃ | khettaṃ | viññāṇaṃ | bījaṃ | taṇhā | sneho. |
nom | nom | nom | nom | nom | nom |
(an) action | (a) field | awareness | (a) seed | thirst | liquid/milk |
action (is) the field, awareness (is) the seed, thirst (is) the moisture |
So here, pairs of nouns are equated or linked together with an implied 'is':
kammaṃ khettaṃ = action is a field etc...
Aside: Copulative verbs
Now while we are on the subject of copulative verbs, it’s important to note that the objects of linking/copula verbs in Pali do not take (as one would expect being objects) the accusative case but that of their subject, even when the verb is expressed.An example:
bhikkhu | kāme | avīta+rāgo | hoti |
Nom | Loc | Nom | Pres, Act |
m | m | m | |
sgl | sgl | sgl | sgl |
3rd pers | |||
A monk | in wanting | not free of infatuation | is |
A monk in wanting, is not free of infatuation |
Note however, there are two verbs in Pali meaning ‘to be’:
- √hū = √bhū => hoti / bhavati which is generally used in a copulative sense, 'is'
- √as => atthi, is used in an existential sense to assert the existence of something or someone. 'There is'
An example:
atthi | kho, | bho, | eso | attā |
pres, act | indec | Nom | Nom | |
m | m | |||
sgl | sgl | sgl | ||
3rd pers | ||||
There is | indeed | friend | this | self |
Indeed friend, there is this self | ||||
Indeed friend, this self exists! |
So to summaries: Equational sentences can be tricky to parse. They can be distinguished by the main verb being a form of hoti / bhavati, or there being no verb at all in the sentence. In either situation the nouns being linked will be in nominative case.
Double Accusatives
The accusative case is used usually to denote a direct object of a transitive verb or motion towards... However there are special cases where a double accusative is sometimes found:- an attribute of another accusative noun. We have already seen an example of two nouns in accusative being in apposition). Here's another:
- with verbs, meaning to ‘call, tell, ask’, which can take two objects:
- what was said and
- to whom it was said.
- and with causative verbs which may also take two accusatives -
- one expressing the person or thing caused to act, and
- the object of the action itself.
upāsakaṃ | maṃ | bhavaṃ | gotamo | dhāretu |
acc | acc | nom | nom | pres, Imp. |
m | m | m | ||
sgl | sgl | sgl | sgl | sgl |
pn-1st | 3rd | |||
a lay devotee | me | Sir, Master | Gotama | (May he) bear |
May Master Gotama bear me (as) a devotee. |
kāḷiṃ | dāsiṃ | etad | avoca |
acc | acc | acc | Aor. |
f | f | n | |
sgl | sgl | sgl | sgl |
3rd | |||
Kāḷī | servant girl | this | (S)he said. |
She told this (to) the servant girl Kāḷī. |
bhagavantaṃ | imaṃ | pañhaṃ | pucchi |
acc | acc | acc | Aor. |
m | m | m | |
sgl | sgl | sgl | sgl |
3rd | |||
Blessed One | this | a question | (he) asked |
He asked the Blessed One this question. |
And slightly differently:
taṃ | ahaṃ | brūmi | brāhmaṇaṃ |
acc | nom | pres, act. | acc |
m | m | ||
sgl | sgl | sgl | sgl |
pn-1st | 1st pers | ||
He / this | I | say | (a) Brahmin |
Him I call a Brahmin |
dārakaṃ | bhagavantaṃ | vandāpesi |
acc | acc | Causative, past |
m | m | |
sgl | sgl | sgl |
3rd Pers | ||
(the) boy | The blessed one | (He) paid homage |
He (had) the boy pay homage (to) the blessed one |
Move on Causative verbs in a later post...
We'll continue with our subject of noun attributes with a closer look at Pali Language adjectives in the next post...
Comments